public inbox for mauve-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
To: tromey@redhat.com
Cc: Dalibor Topic <robilad@yahoo.com>, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>,
	 mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: ResourceBundle variants and child variants
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:31:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1039559495.7421.132.camel@elsschot> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877kehsemy.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

Hi,

On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 23:17, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Mark> I don't think that it is such a slam-dunk as Andrew says but removing
> Mark> (or disabling) these tests does make sense. Does anybody disagree?
> 
> Is there any way to test the 1.4 JDK and see what Sun is up to?  I
> realize that isn't always normative, but it seems like in this case it
> could be.

It fails the tests current in Mauve (just like gcj).

FAIL: gnu.testlet.java.util.ResourceBundle.getBundle: book sample (number 2)
FAIL: gnu.testlet.java.util.ResourceBundle.getBundle: book sample (number 5)

They only reason I ask is because I know that kaffe succeeds on these
tests. (And as the test name implies, The Book descibes them.)

Cheers,

Mark

  reply	other threads:[~2002-12-10 22:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-07 10:46 Mark Wielaard
2002-12-09  9:39 ` Andrew Haley
2002-12-09 10:34   ` Mark Wielaard
2002-12-09 10:38     ` Andrew Haley
2002-12-09 11:10       ` Mark Wielaard
2002-12-10  3:03         ` Andrew Haley
2002-12-10  8:45     ` Dalibor Topic
2002-12-10 12:23       ` Mark Wielaard
2002-12-10 14:18         ` Tom Tromey
2002-12-10 14:31           ` Mark Wielaard [this message]
2002-12-12  7:39             ` Mark Wielaard
2002-12-11  2:47           ` Andrew Haley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1039559495.7421.132.camel@elsschot \
    --to=mark@klomp.org \
    --cc=aph@redhat.com \
    --cc=mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=robilad@yahoo.com \
    --cc=tromey@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).