From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23747 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2003 17:20:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23740 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2003 17:20:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO starcraft.mweb.co.za) (196.2.45.78) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Aug 2003 17:20:49 -0000 Received: from pta-dial-196-31-185-216.mweb.co.za ([196.31.185.216]:33070) by starcraft.mweb.co.za with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 19ongU-00085c-00 for mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 19:20:47 +0200 Subject: Re: Configure weirdness From: John Leuner To: mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <200308151520.h7FFKHwr024599@piglet.dstc.edu.au> References: <200308151520.h7FFKHwr024599@piglet.dstc.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1061225035.414.31.camel@cmalu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 17:20:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-q3/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2 I'm also in favour of redoing the build system for mauve. The project needs to be a little easier to use for new users (and for maintainers too). John Leuner On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 16:20, Stephen Crawley wrote: > Mark Wielaard wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 14:49, Andrew Haley wrote: > > > Out of interest, what versions of aclocal, automake, and > > > autoconf work with Mauve for you? > > > > I am using: > > automake 1.7.6 > > autoconf 2.57 > > ... and I'm using automake 1.6.1 and autoconf 2.53 with no problems. > > I agree that getting rid of Mauve's dependency on automake / autoconf > would be a good idea. > > -- Steve > > > > > -- Steve -- John Leuner