From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32141 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2004 11:15:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32119 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2004 11:15:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO punt-mx0.dmpriest.net.uk) (62.13.128.134) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 12 Nov 2004 11:15:05 -0000 Received: from squirrel.dmpriest.net.uk (secure.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.25]) by punt-mx0.dmpriest.net.uk (8.12.11/8.12.11/Kp) with ESMTP id iACBF2gp074187; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:15:02 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.8] (host81-130-208-103.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.130.208.103]) (authenticated bits=0) by squirrel.dmpriest.net.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1/Kp) with ESMTP id iACBF28e050501; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:15:02 GMT (envelope-from david.gilbert@object-refinery.com) Subject: Re: Mauve results... From: David Gilbert To: Mark Wielaard Cc: mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <1100217694.8141.89.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1100217231.5072.11.camel@linux42.overstone> <1100217694.8141.89.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1100258111.4450.13.camel@linux42.overstone> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:15:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633132333134.squirrel.dmpriest.net.uk:Kp X-Powered-By: AuthSMTP - http://www.authsmtp.com - Authenticated SMTP Mail Relay X-Report-SPAM: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-Virus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system! X-SW-Source: 2004-q4/txt/msg00043.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 00:01, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi David, > > On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 00:53, David Gilbert wrote: > > I ran (most of) the Mauve tests tonight (using JamVM 1.2 and the latest > > CVS version of Classpath) and posted the results here for anyone that is > > interested: > > > > http://www.object-refinery.com/classpath/mauve-report/latest/ > > > > The above reports exclude about 10 test files that won't run for me yet > > - I'll look into those when I get a chance. > > Thanks! > Can you post that list of files? > Maybe someone immediately knows what is wrong with those. The tests I excluded were: gnu.testlet.java.awt.image.PixelGrabber.SimpleGrabber gnu.testlet.java.net.DatagramSocket.DatagramSocketTest2 gnu.testlet.java.net.DatagramSocket.DatagramSocketTest gnu.testlet.java.lang.Character.unicode gnu.testlet.java.text.DateFormatSymbols.Test gnu.testlet.java.util.logging.SocketHandler.getFormatter gnu.testlet.java.util.logging.SocketHandler.publish gnu.testlet.java.util.logging.SocketHandler.getFilter gnu.testlet.java.beans.XMLDecoder.jdk14 gnu.testlet.javax.swing.undo.AbstractUndoableEdit.getUndoPresentationName gnu.testlet.javax.swing.undo.AbstractUndoableEdit.getRedoPresentationName gnu.testlet.javax.swing.undo.AbstractUndoableEdit.getPresentationName gnu.testlet.javax.swing.undo.UndoManager.getUndoPresentationName gnu.testlet.javax.swing.undo.UndoManager.getRedoPresentationName gnu.testlet.javax.swing.undo.UndoManager.getUndoOrRedoPresentationName gnu.testlet.javax.swing.JLabel.Icon gnu.testlet.javax.swing.JLabel.Mnemonic I didn't have any time to look into the problems, I would guess that some of the latter tests fail because I compiled Classpath with --disable-gtk-peer (the machine that I run this on has SuSE 9.1 on it, therefore an old-ish version of Gnome, and for a bunch of reasons I don't want to mess around with updating the machine right now). And some failures may be due to bugs in the custom test harness that I run the tests with. It will probably be January before I'll get a chance to put a lot more time into this - but I hope the reports I posted are useful to give developers a quick overview of how the test failures are distributed. Regards, Dave > Cheers, > > Mark