Hi Edwin,

On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 20:08 +0100, Edwin Steiner wrote:
> Currently I'm developing an automated testing framework for
> cacao[2]. You can see preliminary results here (large page!):
> 
> http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/cacaojvm//tgolem/2005-11-18T03-22/mauve.html

Very nice overview!

> One problem I've run accross is that some mauve tests use
> inconsistent names to report PASSes and FAILs. The most troublesome
> cases are those, where a *named* check/fail is followed by an
> *unnamed* one.
> [...]
> If you also think these cases should be fixed (by naming the checks),
> I would be happy to provide patches. Makes more sense than teaching
> my tgolem to work around these cases.

That does make sense to me. Probably the best approach would be to have
an explicit harness.checkPoint("<descriptive string>") after each named
check followed by unnamed ones. But I would be happy with any patch that
solves this issue.

Cheers,

Mark