From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1938 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2006 21:33:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 1928 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jan 2006 21:33:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from kennke.org (HELO box7954.elkhouse.de) (213.9.79.54) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:33:20 +0000 Received: from i6197.i.strato-dslnet.de ([85.73.97.151] helo=[192.168.1.10]) by box7954.elkhouse.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16) (Exim 4.50) id 1Exu2Q-0003GN-VG; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:38:23 +0100 Subject: Updating Mauve tags From: Roman Kennke To: mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com Cc: classpath@gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-l3V2XDKxf+ENkKN7dWdq" Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:33:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1137274393.7808.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 --=-l3V2XDKxf+ENkKN7dWdq Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1169 Hi there, (BTW: This is a Mauve topic, I CC the classpath list because the mauve-discuss list seems so dead). I see that we have a concept of tags in Mauve. That is a collection of keys at the top of each test class. This way we can filter the tests. ATM we have tags for the JDK versions like JDK1.4 JDK1.3 and so on and a couple of other tags. However, it seems that they are not maintained in a usable way, so most people simply include every tag that they can think of (that is what's done in batch_run for example) to run all tests. I would like to fix the tagging of the tests with regard to the JDK versions. And since the current reference is JDK1.5, I would naturally start with this one. What I propose to do is run all the tests under JDK1.5 and set the JDK1.5 tag for all tests that pass there. For all tests that FAIL and have the JDK1.5 tag set, this tag would have to be removed. Later I would like to do the same for JDK1.4 and JDK1.3. (I have no JDK1.2 JDK1.1 or JDK1.0 available, otherwise I would probably do the same for these). What do you think about this? Maybe I completely misunderstand the concept and working of the tags? Cheers, /Roman --=-l3V2XDKxf+ENkKN7dWdq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil Content-length: 189 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDyW4Yn1u2YFrInbcRApreAKCB/Uv1pSH4DgV1rZUf3+/o5mhxiQCgoAEo ufXEqE2RICRE9Qx8451UgYQ= =TUPB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-l3V2XDKxf+ENkKN7dWdq--