From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7852 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2006 10:32:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 7843 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jan 2006 10:32:47 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl (HELO smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl) (213.51.130.201) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:32:45 +0000 Received: from [213.51.130.190] (port=51305 helo=smtp1.groni1.gr.home.nl) by smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EyRfH-0004aK-2M; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:32:43 +0100 Received: from cc977442-a.ensch1.ov.home.nl ([82.75.254.165]:53914 helo=gnu.wildebeest.org) by smtp1.groni1.gr.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EyRf5-0005pp-LX; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:32:31 +0100 Received: from elsschot.wildebeest.org ([192.168.1.26]) by gnu.wildebeest.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EyQyi-0008Dd-00; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:48:44 +0100 Subject: Re: Updating Mauve tags From: Mark Wielaard To: Roman Kennke Cc: mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com, classpath@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <1137369579.7846.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1137274393.7808.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1137361555.9102.78.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1137369579.7846.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+VeGNV3RF8VPx6Xx7Q+I" Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:32:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1137404915.5615.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 --=-+VeGNV3RF8VPx6Xx7Q+I Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 868 Hi Roman, On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 00:59 +0100, Roman Kennke wrote: > The problem that I am seeing is when a test that is written to PASS > under 1.4 fails under 1.5. There are lots of those tests in the > testsuite for the javax.swing package. To be honest, I would just remove those tests and concentrate on the 1.5 ones. > So my plan would have been to tag > all tests that pass under JDK1.5 with the 1.5 tag and those that don't > only with JDK1.4 or whatever is ok. Since the tags are not meant to be > used that way, maybe we can do it different. Could we extend the > choose-classes script to detect !JDK1.x tags in the tag header of java > source files and don't include the test in a JDK1.x test run? I always thought it already worked that way (see the README), so if it doesn't and you can make it actually do that then that would be great. Cheers, Mark --=-+VeGNV3RF8VPx6Xx7Q+I Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-length: 189 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDy2vzxVhZCJWr9QwRAufRAJ9wWi2skG8fBTzXpiFWVsJHH6nlZQCeKZ5M rZ773D1OGgf+26ID9GVBTQI= =Bz44 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-+VeGNV3RF8VPx6Xx7Q+I--