From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31470 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2006 16:57:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 31462 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Feb 2006 16:57:29 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from p54A572FA.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO amy.domain.wg) (84.165.114.250) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:57:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by amy.domain.wg with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FAVOe-0003au-De; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:57:24 +0100 Subject: Re: Re:Mauve liscense:GPL 3? From: Dalibor Topic To: Audrius Meskauskas Cc: Mauve discuss In-Reply-To: <43F58D08.5090307@bluewin.ch> References: <43F58D08.5090307@bluewin.ch> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:57:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1140281844.4956.6.camel@amy.domain.wg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 09:44 +0100, Audrius Meskauskas wrote: > Stupid idea this morning, but if the GPL 3 would be Apache compatible, > maybe we could just show more intiative and merge the Java tests from > THEY testing project? All we need is the JUnit adapter to Mauve that it > is for sure possible to write. I was suggesting this idea long time ago. Sure, next year when the GPL3 is released, we could do that. cheers, dalibor topic