From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10528 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2006 18:28:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 10520 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jul 2006 18:28:52 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:28:50 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k6RISmxF016056; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:28:48 -0400 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k6RISl4c006127; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:28:47 -0400 Received: from tony.toronto.redhat.com (tony.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.158]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k6RISlGi017087; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:28:47 -0400 Subject: Re: RFC: Jessie tests From: Anthony Balkissoon To: Casey Marshall Cc: mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <7747DBCC-AA1E-4178-A7F2-24A748B012E0@gnu.org> References: <7747DBCC-AA1E-4178-A7F2-24A748B012E0@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:28:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1154024927.2457.86.camel@tony.toronto.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 (2.6.0-1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q3/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:30 -0700, Casey Marshall wrote: > I have some tests for the new version of Jessie (our SSL provider) > that I'm working on, but was curious if checking them in will disrupt > anyone. Right now, the tests will only compile and run against the > ssl-nio-branch of Classpath, and I will merge the code into the > generics branch once it's OK to do so (that is, probably after the > 0.92 release). > > So, these tests will only compile and run right now against the ssl- > nio branch, and after the merge will work with the generics branch, > but not with trunk. Will either situation be unreasonably disruptive? > If not, I'll check these tests in this weekend. > I don't think this is a problem. They will show up as FAILs but that's about the worst that should happen. Doesn't bother me, but maybe someone else has some input. Tony