* RFC: Jessie tests
@ 2006-07-27 0:30 Casey Marshall
2006-07-27 18:28 ` Anthony Balkissoon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Casey Marshall @ 2006-07-27 0:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mauve-discuss
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 630 bytes --]
I have some tests for the new version of Jessie (our SSL provider)
that I'm working on, but was curious if checking them in will disrupt
anyone. Right now, the tests will only compile and run against the
ssl-nio-branch of Classpath, and I will merge the code into the
generics branch once it's OK to do so (that is, probably after the
0.92 release).
So, these tests will only compile and run right now against the ssl-
nio branch, and after the merge will work with the generics branch,
but not with trunk. Will either situation be unreasonably disruptive?
If not, I'll check these tests in this weekend.
Thanks.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 478 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC: Jessie tests
2006-07-27 0:30 RFC: Jessie tests Casey Marshall
@ 2006-07-27 18:28 ` Anthony Balkissoon
2006-07-27 19:44 ` Mark Wielaard
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Balkissoon @ 2006-07-27 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Casey Marshall; +Cc: mauve-discuss
On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:30 -0700, Casey Marshall wrote:
> I have some tests for the new version of Jessie (our SSL provider)
> that I'm working on, but was curious if checking them in will disrupt
> anyone. Right now, the tests will only compile and run against the
> ssl-nio-branch of Classpath, and I will merge the code into the
> generics branch once it's OK to do so (that is, probably after the
> 0.92 release).
>
> So, these tests will only compile and run right now against the ssl-
> nio branch, and after the merge will work with the generics branch,
> but not with trunk. Will either situation be unreasonably disruptive?
> If not, I'll check these tests in this weekend.
>
I don't think this is a problem. They will show up as FAILs but that's
about the worst that should happen. Doesn't bother me, but maybe
someone else has some input.
Tony
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC: Jessie tests
2006-07-27 18:28 ` Anthony Balkissoon
@ 2006-07-27 19:44 ` Mark Wielaard
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Wielaard @ 2006-07-27 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anthony Balkissoon; +Cc: Casey Marshall, mauve-discuss
Hi Casey,
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 14:28 -0400, Anthony Balkissoon wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:30 -0700, Casey Marshall wrote:
> > So, these tests will only compile and run right now against the ssl-
> > nio branch, and after the merge will work with the generics branch,
> > but not with trunk. Will either situation be unreasonably disruptive?
> > If not, I'll check these tests in this weekend.
> >
> I don't think this is a problem. They will show up as FAILs but that's
> about the worst that should happen. Doesn't bother me, but maybe
> someone else has some input.
As Tony says, the Harness just marks those tests as FAILs for now since
they don't compile. But I think that is fine.
Cheers,
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-07-27 19:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-07-27 0:30 RFC: Jessie tests Casey Marshall
2006-07-27 18:28 ` Anthony Balkissoon
2006-07-27 19:44 ` Mark Wielaard
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).