From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10666 invoked by alias); 27 Dec 2006 15:32:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 10656 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Dec 2006 15:32:03 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wildebeest.demon.nl (HELO gnu.wildebeest.org) (83.160.170.119) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:31:54 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.14] (helo=[192.168.1.14]) by gnu.wildebeest.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Gzal4-0001qE-00; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 16:31:58 +0100 Subject: Re: junit.framework.Assert From: Mark Wielaard To: Audrius Meskauskas Cc: mauve-discuss@sourceware.org, Roman Kennke In-Reply-To: <4590364F.6020503@bluewin.ch> References: <4590364F.6020503@bluewin.ch> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:32:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1167233505.11559.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 (2.8.2.1-2.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q4/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 Hi Audrius, On Mon, 2006-12-25 at 21:36 +0100, Audrius Meskauskas wrote: > Today I have discovered that junit.framework.Assert seems not > compileable, because it twice calls the non existing methods of the > TestHarness: > check(double, double, double). > > It seems trivial to implement the workaround. Should we fix this? Yes, please. I just noticed this today. I assume this class isn't compiled in the default Makefile/Harness implementation. But it is bad to have non-compilable classes in the tree (makes some IDEs like Eclipse really unhappy). Cheers, Mark