From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mauve-discuss-return-325-listarch-mauve-discuss=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 6204 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2002 14:13:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mauve-discuss-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/mauve-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 6179 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2002 14:13:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO executor.cambridge.redhat.com) (195.224.55.237)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 2002 14:13:28 -0000
Received: from cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com (vpn50-38.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.38])
	by executor.cambridge.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 48736ABB0D; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 15:13:25 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from aph@localhost)
	by cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id g6HEDfI15713;
	Wed, 17 Jul 2002 15:13:41 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com: aph set sender to aph@cambridge.redhat.com using -f
From: Andrew Haley <aph@cambridge.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15669.31636.563593.335103@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 07:13:00 -0000
To: Brian Jones <cbj@gnu.org>
Cc: Stephen Crawley <crawley@dstc.edu.au>,
	John Leuner <jewel@pixie.co.za>, Alex Lau <alex@dentonlive.com>,
	kissme-general@lists.sourceforge.net, Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>,
	mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Kissme-general] Re: Should I or not submit changes?
In-Reply-To: <m3adorunj9.fsf@lyta.haphazard.org>
References: <200207170047.g6H0l3R11371@piglet.dstc.edu.au>
	<m3adorunj9.fsf@lyta.haphazard.org>
X-SW-Source: 2002-q3/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2

Brian Jones writes:
 > 
 > Yes, it really sucks to try to use Mauve in certain ways.  If anyone
 > has loads of time it would probably be more interesting to develop
 > junit based tests from the classpath source as a start and gradual
 > port of the Mauve tests to what is usually a more familiar test
 > framework to developers at large.

If mauve wasn't such a pain to use and hack on I certainly would have
contributed more to it.  Dejagnu, although horrible in its own special
way, at least allows individual tests to be developed and used without
needing the framework.

Andrew.