From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mauve-discuss-return-1012-listarch-mauve-discuss=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 23817 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2006 17:35:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 23805 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Feb 2006 17:35:50 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from cpc3-cmbg8-4-0-cust164.cmbg.cable.ntl.com (HELO zapata.pink) (82.16.12.164)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:35:50 +0000
Received: from zapata.pink (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) 	by zapata.pink (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1GHbBsf012303; 	Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:37:12 GMT
Received: (from aph@localhost) 	by zapata.pink (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k1GHbAih012298; 	Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:37:10 GMT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <17396.47174.135058.560960@zapata.pink>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:35:00 -0000
From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
To: Stuart Ballard <stuart.a.ballard@gmail.com>
Cc: Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org>, GNU Classpath <classpath@gnu.org>,         mauve-discuss@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Mauve license
In-Reply-To: <ba76afd90602160925r6e3e2d4fj52ad5025b2842f80@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ba76afd90602160755t72a84b31l402af391a5dfe61d@mail.gmail.com> 	<43F4B2F9.9090801@dellroad.org> 	<ba76afd90602160925r6e3e2d4fj52ad5025b2842f80@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mauve-discuss-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/mauve-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:mauve-discuss@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mauve-discuss-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2

I don't really understand your reasoning here.  You haven't explained
why all the usual reasons in favour of GPL don't apply to testsuites.

Andrew.