From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6250 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2006 23:53:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 6067 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Feb 2006 23:53:43 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:53:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1KNrali017749; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 18:53:36 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k1KNra126263; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 18:53:36 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain.redhat.com (vpn50-81.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.81]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1KNrX5G006260; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 18:53:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17402.21244.605800.963673@localhost.localdomain> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:53:00 -0000 To: Dalibor Topic Cc: Audrius Meskauskas , Mauve discuss Subject: Re: Re:Mauve liscense:GPL 3? In-Reply-To: <1140281844.4956.6.camel@amy.domain.wg> References: <43F58D08.5090307@bluewin.ch> <1140281844.4956.6.camel@amy.domain.wg> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Dalibor" == Dalibor Topic writes: Dalibor> On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 09:44 +0100, Audrius Meskauskas wrote: >> Stupid idea this morning, but if the GPL 3 would be Apache compatible, >> maybe we could just show more intiative and merge the Java tests from >> THEY testing project? All we need is the JUnit adapter to Mauve that it >> is for sure possible to write. I was suggesting this idea long time ago. Dalibor> Sure, next year when the GPL3 is released, we could do that. I'm not sure we even need that. Couldn't we have a single harness to run both sets of tests and distribute the result under a mixed license? Tom