* Interface Tests
@ 1999-01-25 16:45 Aaron M. Renn
[not found] ` < 36AD103E.CB6DAB3F@urbanophile.com >
1999-04-01 0:00 ` Aaron M. Renn
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Aaron M. Renn @ 1999-01-25 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mauve-discuss
I'm starting to write tests for java.sql. As you are probably aware, that
package is mostly interfaces, with only a handful of small classes. I wrote
a test case for the Connection interface. It basically consists of
verifying that the interface constants have the correct value. However, I
also had it implement the interface and stubbed out all the methods in order
to see if would compile. Does this sort of check seem valueable to anyone,
or do you think I'm just wasting my time?
I checked the test in if anyone wants to look at it:
gnu/testlet/java/sql/Connection/TestJdbc10.java
--
Aaron M. Renn (arenn@urbanophile.com) http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread[parent not found: < 36AD103E.CB6DAB3F@urbanophile.com >]
* Re: Interface Tests
[not found] ` < 36AD103E.CB6DAB3F@urbanophile.com >
@ 1999-01-26 5:41 ` Anthony Green
1999-04-01 0:00 ` Anthony Green
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Green @ 1999-01-26 5:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: arenn; +Cc: mauve-discuss
Aaron wrote:
> However, I
> also had it implement the interface and stubbed out all the methods in order
> to see if would compile. Does this sort of check seem valueable to anyone,
> or do you think I'm just wasting my time?
I think this is a great idea.
We should really improve the build process so it can survive
individual build failures and record them as such.
AG
--
Anthony Green Cygnus Solutions
Sunnyvale, California
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: Interface Tests
1999-01-26 5:41 ` Anthony Green
@ 1999-04-01 0:00 ` Anthony Green
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Green @ 1999-04-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: arenn; +Cc: mauve-discuss
Aaron wrote:
> However, I
> also had it implement the interface and stubbed out all the methods in order
> to see if would compile. Does this sort of check seem valueable to anyone,
> or do you think I'm just wasting my time?
I think this is a great idea.
We should really improve the build process so it can survive
individual build failures and record them as such.
AG
--
Anthony Green Cygnus Solutions
Sunnyvale, California
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Interface Tests
1999-01-25 16:45 Interface Tests Aaron M. Renn
[not found] ` < 36AD103E.CB6DAB3F@urbanophile.com >
@ 1999-04-01 0:00 ` Aaron M. Renn
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Aaron M. Renn @ 1999-04-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mauve-discuss
I'm starting to write tests for java.sql. As you are probably aware, that
package is mostly interfaces, with only a handful of small classes. I wrote
a test case for the Connection interface. It basically consists of
verifying that the interface constants have the correct value. However, I
also had it implement the interface and stubbed out all the methods in order
to see if would compile. Does this sort of check seem valueable to anyone,
or do you think I'm just wasting my time?
I checked the test in if anyone wants to look at it:
gnu/testlet/java/sql/Connection/TestJdbc10.java
--
Aaron M. Renn (arenn@urbanophile.com) http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1999-04-01 0:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-01-25 16:45 Interface Tests Aaron M. Renn
[not found] ` < 36AD103E.CB6DAB3F@urbanophile.com >
1999-01-26 5:41 ` Anthony Green
1999-04-01 0:00 ` Anthony Green
1999-04-01 0:00 ` Aaron M. Renn
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).