From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Archie Cobbs To: warrenl@cygnus.com (Warren Levy) Cc: jmc@cmpharm.ucsf.edu, java-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com, mauve-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: BufferedOutputStream patch Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 18:15:00 -0000 Message-id: <199906240115.SAA32617@bubba.whistle.com> References: X-SW-Source: 1999-q2/msg00027.html Warren Levy writes: > So folks, anyone have opinions/justifications either way? Is the JDK 1.1 > doc'ed behavior the way to go (BufferedOutputStream flush on overflow; > BufferedWriter flush on fill)? Or the JDK 1.2 doc'ed behavior (flush on > fill for both)? Or neither (flush on overflow for both)? I'm interested > in hearing the different points of view on this. If you supply empirical > evidence, please note whether it is version 1.1.* or 1.2 of the JDK. For what it's worth, kaffe flushes on overflow for both. -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com