From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21773 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2004 08:36:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21764 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2004 08:36:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO interway.li) (217.8.192.21) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Mar 2004 08:36:44 -0000 Received: from [217.8.197.67] (HELO [192.168.1.33]) by interway.li (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 983501; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 09:36:46 +0100 From: Sascha Brawer To: , Stephen Crawley Subject: Re: Mauve regressions for J2SDK 1.4.2 Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 08:36:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20040301083640.27017@smtp.mail.ch.easynet.net> In-Reply-To: <200402290732.i1T7WQOR011001@piglet.dstc.edu.au> References: <200402290732.i1T7WQOR011001@piglet.dstc.edu.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-q1/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 Stephen Crawley wrote on Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:32:28 +1000: >As a sanity check of the mauve testcases, I ran them against the Java >compiler and JVM in Sun's JDK 1.4.2. The results are attached. > >Without looking at the 106 failures in detail, I suspect that most are >due to bugs in the testcases themselves. I can only comment on the FAILs for java.awt.geom: In the Sun JDK 1.4.1_01, the methods CubicCurve2D.solveCubic and QuadCurve2D.solveQuadratic are indeed not able to find many existing solutions. In other words, those bugs are real, not in the test case. Maybe we need an XFAIL mechanism? This would allow us to specify which testlets are known to fail on what VMs. -- Sascha Sascha Brawer, brawer@dandelis.ch, http://www.dandelis.ch/people/brawer/