From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18608 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2004 17:20:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18595 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2004 17:20:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtpq3.home.nl) (213.51.128.198) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Apr 2004 17:20:09 -0000 Received: from [213.51.128.133] (port=40679 helo=smtp2.home.nl) by smtpq3.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BCicp-00065X-4v; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 19:20:07 +0200 Received: from cc68231-a.ensch1.ov.home.nl ([212.120.112.227]:32790 helo=dumas.thomas.planescape.com) by smtp2.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BCicm-0001ul-OX; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 19:20:04 +0200 From: Thomas Zander To: mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Mauve patches. Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 17:20:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <200404060956.14298.zander@javalobby.org> <200404110848.06673.zander@javalobby.org> <20040411122255.GC21097@lichteblau.com> In-Reply-To: <20040411122255.GC21097@lichteblau.com> Cc: "David Lichteblau" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200404111919.24816.zander@javalobby.org> X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-SW-Source: 2004-q2/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 11 April 2004 14:22, David Lichteblau wrote: > Quoting Thomas Zander (zander@javalobby.org): > > I hope you'll agree that its more important to have people creating > > patches and moving the project forward then to always have a 100% > > correct CVS. (problems can be fixed post-commit) > > No! David; I have not seen you before; an introduction might be in place. After we found out what your part in Mauve is; would you care to elaborate= =20 on your position? I'm assuming we all want the best java test suite there is; and in my=20 experience the project is moving forward too slow to get that to happen.=20 Instead of just shouting 'no!' an alternative solution is always welcome. Thanx. - --=20 Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAeX4ZCojCW6H2z/QRAtPDAJ9UsFw4/Rt4SKHlAbLVOMOnAGyE8QCgjLMP S6M2ClKX4exsFt8aTu6HfG8=3D =3DOl2e -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----