From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31119 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2004 19:37:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31110 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2004 19:37:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtpq3.home.nl) (213.51.128.198) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Apr 2004 19:37:37 -0000 Received: from [213.51.128.132] (port=52816 helo=smtp1.home.nl) by smtpq3.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BCkls-0006EC-CN; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:37:36 +0200 Received: from cc68231-a.ensch1.ov.home.nl ([212.120.112.227]:32938 helo=dumas.thomas.planescape.com) by smtp1.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BCklp-0002zY-8t; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:37:33 +0200 From: Thomas Zander To: "David Lichteblau" Subject: Re: Mauve patches. Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 19:37:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 Cc: mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com References: <200404060956.14298.zander@javalobby.org> <200404111919.24816.zander@javalobby.org> <20040411185745.GD21097@lichteblau.com> In-Reply-To: <20040411185745.GD21097@lichteblau.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200404112136.52657.zander@javalobby.org> X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-SW-Source: 2004-q2/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Unless I misunderstood Thomas' question, he could not compile all of > Mauve because his script tried to compile _everything_, as opposed to > those files usually chosen by the standard build system. I would find > it a little confusing if Mauve provided two build systems, one which > uses tags and one which does not. You did misunderstand my question; the question is that I created a build system that only tests the classes I= =20 select (based on ant) and I want it committed; but there seems to be no=20 maintainer that can comment on, or commit the patch. My question therefor (to be exact) was that if some more freedom for=20 not-yet-initiated coders is allowed, I would like to have a writable=20 cvs-account which means I can continue working without waiting for more=20 then a week. Hope that clears it up. - --=20 Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAeZ5TCojCW6H2z/QRAt1GAJ9BozGa9R0Li6JhJyIIDvj8+q+9hgCfaEPr bOVQl0rJWCtvYzH0mB+r2Jc=3D =3DC+YF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----