From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16296 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2004 17:14:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16287 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2004 17:14:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtpq1.home.nl) (213.51.128.196) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Apr 2004 17:14:33 -0000 Received: from [213.51.128.132] (port=51571 helo=smtp1.home.nl) by smtpq1.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BDRUW-0006jG-KC; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 19:14:32 +0200 Received: from cc68231-a.ensch1.ov.home.nl ([212.120.112.227]:32868 helo=dumas.thomas.planescape.com) by smtp1.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BDRUV-0003NY-Rv; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 19:14:31 +0200 From: Thomas Zander To: Andrew Haley Subject: Re: Mauve patches. Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 17:14:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 Cc: mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com References: <200404060956.14298.zander@javalobby.org> <200404131556.13282.zander@javalobby.org> <16507.63791.746420.624801@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <16507.63791.746420.624801@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200404131913.49935.zander@javalobby.org> X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-SW-Source: 2004-q2/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 13 April 2004 16:29, Andrew Haley wrote: > Thomas writes: > > On Tuesday 13 April 2004 15:19, you wrote: > > > Yes. I suppose Thomas' Ant script should do the right thing with > > > respect to the tags. > > > > The selecting of files based on some 'tag in their content is quite > > easy in ant; its a standard target. > > I could add an ant-build target that builds based on tags. > > Excellent. Now I feel not so bad for being slow to commit... Hmm; I kind of (really) like working in CVS, its like a net that catches=20 you when you fail (and more). What about you commit first; then I can safely start to work on adding=20 extra features. I mean; all the questions I posed have been quietly been ignored, I'm not=20 really under the impression Mauve is getting the attention it deserves; I=20 honestly begin starting to wonder if putting it in a CVS on sourceforge or= =20 whereever, and more freely giving out CVS accounts is such a bad idea. Some rights to commit and/or to clean up the webpages is the only thing=20 standing in my way to really help make Mauve move forward! - --=20 Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAfB/LCojCW6H2z/QRAp7eAKDCzNrGAZhIg9c4mLaje2RmIY7/gACeIQ5k wsvu26crbD4glB6ncSiqUlo=3D =3DsJxK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----