From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22467 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2004 18:59:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22460 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2004 18:59:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtpq2.home.nl) (213.51.128.197) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Apr 2004 18:59:22 -0000 Received: from [213.51.128.135] (port=59325 helo=smtp4.home.nl) by smtpq2.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BDT7x-0003B7-BS for mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 20:59:21 +0200 Received: from cc68231-a.ensch1.ov.home.nl ([212.120.112.227]:33090 helo=dumas.thomas.planescape.com) by smtp4.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BDT83-0001Vt-Rm for mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 20:59:28 +0200 From: Thomas Zander To: mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Mauve patches. Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 18:59:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <200404060956.14298.zander@javalobby.org> <200404131913.49935.zander@javalobby.org> <16508.9997.393675.283091@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <16508.9997.393675.283091@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200404132058.37587.zander@javalobby.org> X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-SW-Source: 2004-q2/txt/msg00030.txt.bz2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 13 April 2004 19:44, Andrew Haley wrote: > =A0> > =A0> Hmm; I kind of (really) like working in CVS, its like a net that > catches > you when you fail (and more). > =A0> What about you commit first; then I can safely start to work on > adding > extra features. > > Alright. Thank you. > =A0> I mean; all the questions I posed have been quietly been ignored, I'm > not > really under the impression Mauve is getting the attention it > deserves; I > honestly begin starting to wonder if putting it in a CVS > on sourceforge or > whereever, and more freely giving out CVS accounts > is such a bad idea. > > Actually, all the questions you posed have not quietly been ignored. > I have answered some of them. Indeed, I stand corrected, you did answer some of them. > =A0> Some rights to commit and/or to clean up the webpages is the only > =A0> thing standing in my way to really help make Mauve move forward! > > That and the fact that as yet you have not managed correctly to submit > a patch. =A0I have attached a version here, FYI. > > I don't think I've broken anything with the checkin, but please check. Hmm; I'm wondering what was wrong with the last patch I sent; the only=20 difference I see is that I failed to mention the new method in=20 SimpleTestHarness, and the change in statics in=20 SimpleDateFormat/attribute.java. Was it a bad choice to sent it as a bzip2 compressed patch? Anyway; you forgot this thingy: diff -U3 -p -N -r mauve-orig/.cvsignore mauve-new/.cvsignore - --- mauve-orig/.cvsignore 2004-04-03 17:59:23.000000000 +0200 +++ mauve-new/.cvsignore 2004-04-03 17:55:59.000000000 +0200 @@ -9,3 +9,5 @@ config.status dataoutput.out utf8test.out todos.txt +build +doc Cheers! - --=20 Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAfDhcCojCW6H2z/QRAr6bAKC4sunY3qwseVScgx6QpTaIFrQOHwCgn2tD wI68OhAeY52gyBerWTLo7As=3D =3DWGVb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----