From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7250 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2005 12:32:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7158 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2005 12:32:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kiev.dev.factotummedia.nl) (195.18.123.2) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2005 12:32:01 -0000 Received: from amavis by kiev.dev.factotummedia.nl with scanned-ok (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cvaim-0000Wc-00; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:32:00 +0100 Received: from kiev.dev.factotummedia.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kiev [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01887-03; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:32:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from zander by kiev.dev.factotummedia.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cvail-0000WU-00; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:31:59 +0100 Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:32:00 -0000 To: Jeroen Frijters Cc: mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Unicode test noise Message-ID: <20050131123159.GA1875@factotummedia.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: From: Thomas Zander X-SW-Source: 2005-q1/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 998 But it really is a lot of tests; there is nothing wrong with that. The real fix is in a better runner. Perhaps I should publish the runner I have been working on, it solves this problem already. (except that you get one page which is really big :) I think any of those changes are not a good idea. On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 01:13:58PM +0100, Jeroen Frijters wrote: > Michael Koch wrote: > > Am Montag, 31. Januar 2005 12:34 schrieb Jeroen Frijters: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Does anyone have any objections against this patch to eliminate the > > > noise that the unicode test generates? > >=20 > > Why don't you just skip the tests ? You change would make the tests=20 > > don't show up in summaries when they succeed. >=20 > I don't want to skip the tests, it's just that I don't think it is > meaningful to have that single test count as 3.5 million tests, and in > addition it makes the -verbose option incredibly slow. >=20 > How about this patch? >=20 > Regards, > Jeroen --=20 Thomas Zander --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline Content-length: 189 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB/iU/CojCW6H2z/QRAj4IAKCEdBQ9cft9waSk+fu1QiSSFe9jHgCg030I dQAQ2kcP2roMd7ayxuQYfWM= =nccS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J--