From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mauve-discuss-return-834-listarch-mauve-discuss=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 13477 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2005 09:36:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mauve-discuss-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/mauve-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 13336 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2005 09:36:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO namlook.thomas.planescape.com) (217.123.137.115)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 29 Apr 2005 09:36:40 -0000
Received: from dumas.thomas.planescape.com ([10.0.0.2] ident=zander)
	by namlook.thomas.planescape.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1DRRv2-000284-00; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 11:36:20 +0200
From: Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org>
To: classpath@gnu.org,
 Steven Schwarz <schwarz@solekai.com>
Subject: Re: can Mauve help me test a PersonalJava implementation?
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:36:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.50
Cc: mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com
References: <XFMail.20050428155232.schwarz@solekai.com>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20050428155232.schwarz@solekai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart4570345.AhyhALqggU";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200504291135.54690.zander@kde.org>
X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2

--nextPart4570345.AhyhALqggU
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-length: 643

On Friday 29 April 2005 00:52, Steven Schwarz wrote:
> I've been tasked with confirming the claim made by a PersonalJava VM
> vendor that their implementation passes the Mauve suite.

The trick is that you _run_ it agains the target JVM.  What you compile it=
=20
with is irrelevant.

I suggest you type=20
   JAVA_HOME=3D/usr/lib/j2sdk1.5.0 ant jars
or similar to produce the jar.
After that you can just run the test suite using the compiled classes.

ps. I noticed that the mauve suite again does not compile against an 1.5=20
compiler. (enum problems and stuff like that) I'll try to fix them again=20
later today. :}

--=20
Thomas Zander

--nextPart4570345.AhyhALqggU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-length: 189

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCcf/6CojCW6H2z/QRAkBeAJ4/CVUQnsIFq9zWZebykUeMpTXFIgCg1X8I
JsHGUTCebcIgFyePyuMHffA=
=TfKB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart4570345.AhyhALqggU--