public inbox for mauve-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dr Andrew John Hughes <ahughes@redhat.com>
To: Pavel Tisnovsky <ptisnovs@redhat.com>
Cc: mauve-discuss@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFC: fix for Mauve test javax/swing/JTextArea/prefferedSize.java
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 15:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110907153511.GA18346@rivendell.middle-earth.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E6756FC.6010701@redhat.com>

On 13:35 Wed 07 Sep     , Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
> Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> > On 17:09 Fri 02 Sep     , Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
> >> Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> >>> On 16:17 Fri 02 Sep     , Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
> >>>> Greetings,
> >>>>
> >>>> I think that the last 6 checks contained in Mauve test
> >>>> "javax/swing/JTextArea/prefferedSize.java" should be changed. In the original
> >>>> test, the preferred width of the JTextArea is compared with 100 pixels after
> >>>> word line wrapping is enabled.
> >>>>
> >>>> But it does not make sense (IMHO) because the JTextArea contains only empty text
> >>>> or some NL characters ('\n'), which means, that preferred and minimum width of
> >>>> JTextArea should be 0 pixels, not 100 in both cases because empty text and NL
> >>>> sequence has only some non-zero height, but zero width. This behaviour is
> >>>> independent of auto wrapping and/or word wrapping.
> >>>>
> >>>> It's probably worth to add some check for preferred height.
> >>>>
> >>>> Here is proposed change to this test:
> >>>>
> >>>> --- preferredSize.java  2005-12-07 20:23:38.000000000 +0100
> >>>> +++ prefferedsize.java  2011-09-02 16:02:00.000000000 +0200
> >>>> @@ -51,14 +51,14 @@
> >>>>          ta2.setLineWrap(true);
> >>>>          ta2.setWrapStyleWord(true);
> >>>>
> >>>> -        harness.check (ta2.getPreferredSize().width == 100);
> >>>> -        harness.check (view.getPreferredSpan(View.HORIZONTAL) == 100);
> >>>> +        harness.check (ta2.getPreferredSize().width == 0);
> >>>> +        harness.check (view.getPreferredSpan(View.HORIZONTAL) == 0);
> >>>>          ta2.setText("");
> >>>> -        harness.check (ta2.getPreferredSize().width == 100);
> >>>> -        harness.check (view.getPreferredSpan(View.HORIZONTAL) == 100);
> >>>> +        harness.check (ta2.getPreferredSize().width == 0);
> >>>> +        harness.check (view.getPreferredSpan(View.HORIZONTAL) == 0);
> >>>>          ta2.setText("\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n");
> >>>> -        harness.check (ta2.getPreferredSize().width == 100);
> >>>> -        harness.check (view.getPreferredSpan(View.HORIZONTAL) == 100);
> >>>> +        harness.check (ta2.getPreferredSize().width == 0);
> >>>> +        harness.check (view.getPreferredSpan(View.HORIZONTAL) == 0);
> >>>>        }
> >>>>      catch (Exception e)
> >>>>        {
> >>>> ~
> >>>>
> >>>> Is it possible to change this test case please?
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Pavel
> >>> Do tests still pass with these changes?
> >> yes
> > 
> > On both OpenJDK and GNU Classpath?
> 
> They pass only on OpenJDK. On GNU Classpath (4.4.4), some tests failed
> regardless of whether the patch has been applied or not. But the failures
> occurred on previous test not touched by the patch:
> 
>         ta2.setText("");
>         harness.check (ta2.getPreferredSize().width == 0);
>         harness.check (view.getPreferredSpan(View.HORIZONTAL) == 0);
>         ta2.setText("\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n");
>         harness.check (ta2.getPreferredSize().width == 0);
>         harness.check (view.getPreferredSpan(View.HORIZONTAL) == 0);
> 
> before the line wrap & word wrap is enabled.
> 
> The proposed patch fixes other failures on OpenJDK & GNU Classpath too, ie:
> OpenJDK:       6 failures -> 0 failures
> GNU Classpath: 8 failures -> 2 failures
> 
> Pavel

You seem to have sent this twice...

I guess this is ok, but I have to admit I don't really know this GUI stuff that
well.  Would be good if someone else could take a look.
-- 
Andrew :)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and IcedTea
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://icedtea.classpath.org
PGP Key: F5862A37 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EA30 D855 D50F 90CD F54D  0698 0713 C3ED F586 2A37

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-07 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-02 14:15 Pavel Tisnovsky
2011-09-02 15:03 ` Dr Andrew John Hughes
2011-09-02 15:07   ` Pavel Tisnovsky
2011-09-07  2:39     ` Dr Andrew John Hughes
2011-09-07 11:34       ` Pavel Tisnovsky
2011-09-07 15:35         ` Dr Andrew John Hughes [this message]
2011-09-12  9:13           ` Mark Wielaard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110907153511.GA18346@rivendell.middle-earth.co.uk \
    --to=ahughes@redhat.com \
    --cc=mauve-discuss@sourceware.org \
    --cc=ptisnovs@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).