From: Robert Schuster <theBohemian@gmx.net>
To: mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Discussing a helper class to migrate from JUnit
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 15:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41FD0418.1030703@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001701c50624$43f8df20$2101a8c0@computername>
Hello Audrius,
AFAIK a solution that allows JUnit tests being run as part of mauve is
frequently discussed here but there was no result yet.
Former discussions could IMHO not solve this problem:
JUnit uses reflection and therefore depends on a stable support for this
mechanism. Mauve as a framework for testing the basic functionality of a
VM could therefore not depend on a working reflection API.
Despite from that I like the idea of faking a JUnit environment to run
such tests. However that environment should be created with only minimal
dependency on the VM.
My suggestion is that for each testcase TC you have to:
* scan the class file of TC with something like javap
* generate Java source code that calls the public methods of TC,
call that an adapter class AC
* compile the AC
* run the mauve test via the AC
These are only basic thoughts.
Meskauskas Audrius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Following the rules of the Mauve project, I would like to discuss the
> following addition to Mauve before submission:
>
> Motivation:
> JUnit is another popular testing suite. Some people may already have a
> JUnit tests written and need to adapt them for Mauve. Some code
> generators produce tests for JUnit and not for Mauve. In this context,
> it seems good to have an additional helper class for easier conversion
> of JUnit TestCase into Mauve Testlet. It is possible to have the
> individual helper class as a part of the test itself. However it may
> be better to have it in a more public place where it could be shared.
>
> Suggestion:
> 1. The JUnit TestCase calls static methods like assertTrue(..),
> assertEquals(..) and so on. The helper class can have the identically
> named non-static methods, just delegating the call to the current
> instance of TestHarness.
I think that the helper class to live in the same package as the real
JUnit classes.
>
> 2. The JUnit TestCase has a multiple public non static parameterless
> methods, starting with test.... These methods are found and called
> using reflection. The helper class can do just the same.
IMHO reflection is considered high-tech which may be broken/unsupported
on a VM.
cu
Robert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-30 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-29 17:03 Meskauskas Audrius
2005-01-30 15:59 ` Robert Schuster [this message]
2005-01-30 16:11 ` Thomas Zander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41FD0418.1030703@gmx.net \
--to=thebohemian@gmx.net \
--cc=mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).