From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6460 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2005 03:44:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6395 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2005 03:44:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2005 03:44:54 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1J3irX6003529 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 22:44:53 -0500 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j1J3imK25898 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 22:44:48 -0500 Received: from [172.16.14.67] (towel.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.67]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j1J3im7l010738 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 22:44:48 -0500 Message-ID: <4216B630.2030109@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 03:44:00 -0000 From: Bryce McKinlay User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com Subject: JLS vs JDK tags Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-q1/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 Does it make any sense to keep JLS tags in mauve? Only a handful of test cases use them. I'd like to simplify the tags a little and convert JLS1.2 -> JDK1.2, etc. Bryce