From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9090 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2005 14:31:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9077 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Oct 2005 14:31:16 -0000 Received: from ms-smtp-01-lbl.southeast.rr.com (HELO ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com) (24.25.9.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:31:16 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (cpe-065-190-161-014.nc.res.rr.com [65.190.161.14]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id j9EEV4We011483; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:31:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <434FC129.3030603@nc.rr.com> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:31:00 -0000 From: Brian Jones User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Koch CC: Norman Hendrich , classpath@gnu.org, mauve-discuss@sourceware.org Subject: Re: classpath+mauve References: <200510141356.j9EDuS4O015670@rzdspc1.informatik.uni-hamburg.de> <20051014140125.GC27035@asterix.konqueror.de> In-Reply-To: <20051014140125.GC27035@asterix.konqueror.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-q4/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 Michael Koch wrote: >On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 03:56:28PM +0200, Norman Hendrich wrote: > > >>Hello David and Audrius, >> >>first of all, thanks for your answers to my mauve-setup question(s). >>I tried the MakeTestClassList program, which seems to work fine. >>However, after spending another few hours trying to get the whole >>testsuite running, my worst fears are confirmed... To summarize: >> >>* writing new testcases is easy >> >>* running individual testcases is easy (from the shell or eclipse) >> >>* running parts of the testsuite via an index file works. >> >>* BUT there is no easy way to run the whole testsuite. A developer >> first has to create a custom list of exclusion testcases, before >> running the remaining fraction of the testsuite... >> >> > >Not true. I just use the batch_run utility to run them all. I know that >Mark uses this too. > > >Cheers, >Michael > > Yes, due to the nature of how a JVM can fail... especially with respect to hanging and doing nothing, you have to wrap execution of each test case in a fashion that will kill the JVM if it does not exit in a reasonable period of time. I think this batch_run utility does that. I used to have a nice little set of scripts that did something similar and created pretty graphs.