From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19528 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2006 10:59:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 19510 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jan 2006 10:59:13 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from outmail128179.authsmtp.co.uk (HELO outmail128179.authsmtp.co.uk) (62.13.128.179) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:59:11 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.15] (host217-37-65-246.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.37.65.246]) (authenticated bits=0) by squirrel.dmpriest.net.uk (8.13.3/8.13.3/Kp) with ESMTP id k0GAx3uF085528; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:59:03 GMT (envelope-from david.gilbert@object-refinery.com) Message-ID: <43CB7CA1.6040602@object-refinery.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:59:00 -0000 From: David Gilbert User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Kennke CC: Mark Wielaard , classpath@gnu.org, mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Updating Mauve tags References: <1137274393.7808.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1137361555.9102.78.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1137369579.7846.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1137369579.7846.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server-Quench: 1ba24185-867f-11da-84c5-001185d377ca X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633132333134.squirrel.dmpriest.net.uk:1.45/Kp X-Powered-By: AuthSMTP - http://www.authsmtp.com - Authenticated SMTP Mail Relay X-Report-SPAM: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-Virus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system! X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2 Roman Kennke wrote: >The problem that I am seeing is when a test that is written to PASS >under 1.4 fails under 1.5. There are lots of those tests in the >testsuite for the javax.swing package. > Hi Roman, Did I write those tests (or some of them)? If so, send me the file names and I'll see if I can clean them up a bit. When I wrote them, I checked the results only against Sun JDK 1.4.2 (*), but recently I have started to use JDK 1.5 more regularly so now I can work on bringing the tests up to date. Regards, Dave (*) One of the problems with Swing is that the API docs are very much underspecified (completely missing in many cases), so it becomes necessary to make educated guesses when writing the tests, then confirm these against a specific implementation (in my case Sun's 1.4.2).