From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26051 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2006 05:14:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 26043 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Sep 2006 05:14:19 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.cruzio.com (HELO mail.cruzio.com) (63.249.95.37) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 05:14:17 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.108] (dsl-63-249-108-128.cruzio.com [63.249.108.128]) by mail.cruzio.com with ESMTP id k8K5E85V055100; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:14:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4510CE17.2090600@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 05:14:00 -0000 From: Casey Marshall User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeroen Frijters CC: mauve-discuss@sourceware.org Subject: Re: New SocketChannel test that requires testing References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q3/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 Jeroen Frijters wrote: > May be I misunderstood what you meant, we were talking about > isConnected() changing its return value right? The only way I can read > the text you quoted is that it confirms that isConnected() will only > return true iff either connect() or finishConnect() previously returned > true. > Oops, yeah. I was thinking of connect()'s return value.