From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19804 invoked by alias); 25 Dec 2006 20:36:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 19788 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Dec 2006 20:36:38 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail21.bluewin.ch (HELO mail21.bluewin.ch) (195.186.18.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Dec 2006 20:36:31 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.64] (83.76.206.39) by mail21.bluewin.ch (Bluewin 7.3.118) id 457D6CB20043AEFB; Mon, 25 Dec 2006 20:36:29 +0000 Message-ID: <4590364F.6020503@bluewin.ch> Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 20:36:00 -0000 From: Audrius Meskauskas User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mauve-discuss@sourceware.org, Roman Kennke Subject: junit.framework.Assert Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q4/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 Today I have discovered that junit.framework.Assert seems not compileable, because it twice calls the non existing methods of the TestHarness: check(double, double, double). It seems trivial to implement the workaround. Should we fix this? Audrius.