public inbox for mauve-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim@redhat.com>
To: "Steve McKay☄" <smckay@google.com>
Cc: mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Tweaking default java.awt.Robot settings
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:10:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46F94F1F.8000103@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f2ee4520709241331o1a77379cudffb314dc1622914@mail.gmail.com>

Steve McKay☄ wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I've noticed that at least some of the tests using java.awt.Robot are
> non-deterministic due to lags is the underlying window system. The
> java.awt.Component.keyPressTest, for example, fails some of the time
> (on linux, windows, linux+wine, ...). It looks like enabling
> autoWaitForIdle (waits for the awt EventQueue to be empty before
> adding new events to the queue), and setting autoDelay (pauses for an
> arbitrary period of time) to some magic number of millis well above
> zero (I use 100) significantly reduces failures. Would anyone object
> to configuring the Robot with settings like this by default?

No objections here, that sounds like a good idea.  When you say "significantly 
reduces failures", does that mean some non-deterministic failures persist with 
the new auto* settings?

Tom

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-09-25 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-24 20:31 Steve McKay☄
2007-09-24 20:50 ` David Herron
2007-09-24 21:22   ` Steve McKay☄
2007-09-24 21:41     ` David Herron
2007-09-25 18:33       ` Lillian Angel
2007-09-25 19:13         ` Steve McKay☄
2007-09-25 19:27           ` Lillian Angel
2007-09-25 19:37             ` Steve McKay☄
2007-09-25 19:45               ` Lillian Angel
2007-09-25 19:27         ` David Herron
2007-09-25 18:33   ` Thomas Fitzsimmons
2007-09-25 18:57     ` Steve McKay☄
2007-09-25 19:58       ` Thomas Fitzsimmons
2007-09-25 20:28         ` Steve McKay☄
2007-10-04  0:43           ` Steve McKay☄
2007-10-04 13:04             ` Lillian Angel
2007-09-25 19:24     ` David Herron
2007-09-25 18:10 ` Thomas Fitzsimmons [this message]
2007-09-25 18:14   ` Steve McKay☄

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46F94F1F.8000103@redhat.com \
    --to=fitzsim@redhat.com \
    --cc=mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=smckay@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).