From: "Steve McKay☄" <smckay@google.com>
To: "Thomas Fitzsimmons" <fitzsim@redhat.com>
Cc: mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Tweaking default java.awt.Robot settings
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f2ee4520709251114l2c59aecfxbdfe553217fd0113@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46F94F1F.8000103@redhat.com>
Thomas,
I think David's suggestion was better, so I'll work that up instead of
the autoDelay changes I proposed.
--steve
On 9/25/07, Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim@redhat.com> wrote:
> Steve McKay☄ wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've noticed that at least some of the tests using java.awt.Robot are
> > non-deterministic due to lags is the underlying window system. The
> > java.awt.Component.keyPressTest, for example, fails some of the time
> > (on linux, windows, linux+wine, ...). It looks like enabling
> > autoWaitForIdle (waits for the awt EventQueue to be empty before
> > adding new events to the queue), and setting autoDelay (pauses for an
> > arbitrary period of time) to some magic number of millis well above
> > zero (I use 100) significantly reduces failures. Would anyone object
> > to configuring the Robot with settings like this by default?
>
> No objections here, that sounds like a good idea. When you say "significantly
> reduces failures", does that mean some non-deterministic failures persist with
> the new auto* settings?
>
> Tom
>
--
Steve McKay <smckay@google.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-25 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-24 20:31 Steve McKay☄
2007-09-24 20:50 ` David Herron
2007-09-24 21:22 ` Steve McKay☄
2007-09-24 21:41 ` David Herron
2007-09-25 18:33 ` Lillian Angel
2007-09-25 19:13 ` Steve McKay☄
2007-09-25 19:27 ` Lillian Angel
2007-09-25 19:37 ` Steve McKay☄
2007-09-25 19:45 ` Lillian Angel
2007-09-25 19:27 ` David Herron
2007-09-25 18:33 ` Thomas Fitzsimmons
2007-09-25 18:57 ` Steve McKay☄
2007-09-25 19:58 ` Thomas Fitzsimmons
2007-09-25 20:28 ` Steve McKay☄
2007-10-04 0:43 ` Steve McKay☄
2007-10-04 13:04 ` Lillian Angel
2007-09-25 19:24 ` David Herron
2007-09-25 18:10 ` Thomas Fitzsimmons
2007-09-25 18:14 ` Steve McKay☄ [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f2ee4520709251114l2c59aecfxbdfe553217fd0113@mail.gmail.com \
--to=smckay@google.com \
--cc=fitzsim@redhat.com \
--cc=mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).