From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24836 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2007 15:10:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 24724 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Aug 2007 15:10:21 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:10:17 +0000 Received: from zps76.corp.google.com (zps76.corp.google.com [172.25.146.76]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id l7SFA6Lf031005 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:10:07 -0700 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ugem2.prod.google.com [10.66.164.2]) by zps76.corp.google.com with ESMTP id l7SF8xEd031748 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:09:59 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so174867uge for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:09:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.158.1 with SMTP id g1mr952995wae.1188313798944; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:09:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.161.6 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:09:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <545d88bc0708280809w72d2d4ebl523bf4c2d1400d9d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:10:00 -0000 From: "Daniel Kegel" To: "Anthony Green" Subject: Re: Patches for running mauve against wine + win32 vm Cc: "=?UTF-8?Q?Steve_McKay=E2=98=84?=" , mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <46D42F38.8030100@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4f2ee4520708031409o723d606bx78689a245f9fb5ef@mail.gmail.com> <4f2ee4520708271300x38b4a036r201cb5ab92429c00@mail.gmail.com> <545d88bc0708271740xbfb0ad5rbdf8d4877ff16f2d@mail.gmail.com> <46D42F38.8030100@redhat.com> Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q3/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 On 8/28/07, Anthony Green wrote: > Daniel Kegel wrote: > > It turns out this might not be such a good idea after all > > for those tests which time out, > > Are you saying that you not want these patches applied? I don't see > anything in here related to timeouts. The patches are ok. It's just that the whole concept of running the harness in Linux and the tests in Wine is a little iffy, since when a test times out, the Linux kill command makes the Wine JVM unhappy. Wine JVMs prefer to be killed by Windows kill commands. - Dan