From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16696 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2004 20:02:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16650 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2004 20:02:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO email2.peakpeak.com) (207.174.178.92) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Apr 2004 20:02:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 24163 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2004 20:05:54 -0000 Received: from 203-214-189-207.dyn.peakpeak.com (HELO fleche.redhat.com) ([207.189.214.203]) (envelope-sender ) by email2.peakpeak.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Apr 2004 20:05:54 -0000 Received: by fleche.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 628B04F8739; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:51:20 -0600 (MDT) To: Jeff Sturm Cc: Michael Koch , GNU Classpath Project , Mauve News Group Subject: Re: Eclipse and Classpath References: From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom X-Zippy: Now, I think it would be GOOD to buy FIVE or SIX STUDEBAKERS and CRUISE for ARTIFICIAL FLAVORING!! Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:02:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <877jvzhoef.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-q2/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2 Jeff> (What about Mauve? Much of Eclipse's usefulness for us comes from Jeff> interactively running the test suite so we get a very quick Jeff> edit/compile/test/debug cycle. But eclipse only knows about junit-style Jeff> tests, not the gnu.testlet classes in Mauve.) I think Graydon changed Mauve to use JUnit at one point, but it never went in. I think there was some confusion about some points I made. It's time to revisit this (various folks pointed this out to me at the recent RH meeting). IMO anything that makes Mauve easier to hack is a good thing. My only real requirement is that we still be able to run the gcj test suite; I don't think there is any substantial problem here. Tom