From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21399 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2002 22:18:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21371 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2002 22:18:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gash2.peakpeak.com) (207.174.178.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2002 22:18:20 -0000 Received: from fleche.redhat.com (tq0205.peakpeak.com [207.174.177.205]) by gash2.peakpeak.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA08548; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 15:18:12 -0700 Received: by fleche.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A522B4F8056; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 15:17:10 -0700 (MST) To: Mark Wielaard Cc: Dalibor Topic , Andrew Haley , mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: ResourceBundle variants and child variants References: <20021210164514.8588.qmail@web10006.mail.yahoo.com> <1039551787.7415.50.camel@elsschot> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom X-Zippy: While I'm in LEVITTOWN I thought I'd like to see the NUCLEAR FAMILY!! Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:18:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1039551787.7415.50.camel@elsschot> Message-ID: <877kehsemy.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-q4/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2 Mark> Sigh, I really wish there was a real Java standard. Yeah. Though then we'd spend hundreds of hours in committee meetings :-) Mark> I don't think that it is such a slam-dunk as Andrew says but removing Mark> (or disabling) these tests does make sense. Does anybody disagree? Is there any way to test the 1.4 JDK and see what Sun is up to? I realize that isn't always normative, but it seems like in this case it could be. Tom