From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32456 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2006 08:45:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 32448 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Jun 2006 08:45:49 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from marmot.shef.ac.uk (HELO marmot.shef.ac.uk) (143.167.1.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 08:45:43 +0000 Received: from holly.dcs.shef.ac.uk ([143.167.8.1]) by marmot.shef.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FsyLF-0001A8-E1; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:45:41 +0100 Received: from [143.167.10.79] (lap-win-10-79.dcs.shef.ac.uk [143.167.10.79]) by holly.dcs.shef.ac.uk (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5L8jcoq010888; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:45:38 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <1150876346.4407.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1150736580.7451.90.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1150876346.4407.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <9BDBA329-C8C7-4D7C-8D3E-AE58D2D3524B@dcs.shef.ac.uk> Cc: tromey@redhat.com, Mauve News Group Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Andrew John Hughes Subject: Re: new module Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 08:45:00 -0000 To: Mark Wielaard X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750) X-S0phie-Scan: no Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q2/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 On 21 Jun 2006, at 08:52, Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 18:03 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote: >> On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 10:00 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: >>> I added a new 'builder' module to mauve. >>> This has the scripts we use on builder.classpath.org to drive the >>> nightly builds. >>> >>> builder isn't yet set up to use this code, but hopefully I'll be >>> doing that a bit later. First I wanted to clean up a few things in >>> the scripts. >>> >>> Tom >> >> Great news! Particularly take a look at ecj, which still seems to be >> failing, despite me pointing it at our built version in two different >> ways... :( > > Yes, thanks a lot Tom! > I saw Tom added a patch for real gcjx removal in the builder module. I > have installed that patch now on builder.classpath.org and will > monitor > a full build cycle. It seems we were using the gcjx build a lot still > even though I disabled it (in a crappy way, now that I see all the > places Tom needed to patch, sorry about that). If things go right this > should get our ecj-bootstrap back. > > Cheers, > > Mark Hallelujah! We might finally see the result of Tom's concurrency patch. -- Andrew :) Postgraduate Student Verification and Testing Group Department of Computer Science University of Sheffield