From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16653 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2005 09:48:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16475 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2005 09:48:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lembu.sumatrasoftware.com) (62.177.154.238) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2005 09:48:06 -0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: New runner MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 09:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Jeroen Frijters" To: "Thomas Zander" Cc: X-SW-Source: 2005-q1/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 Thomas Zander wrote: > The way the config settings are shipped is not the issue here; the > question where a socket can connect to that is reachable from=20 > the testing machine so the test does not fail because of wrong > reasons is a bigger problem. I thought the tests only connect to an SMTP server? Presumably most people have access to an SMTP server. You could ask a question in the test configuration step (where you ask about awt tests). > When we are actually running this test we already did a 'java=20 > -jar' and we found several classes in that jar. Does that not > imply that the tests in that class will pass? Not necessarily. With IKVM, for example, you can pre-compile the jar into a .NET executable and run that directly, that way no Java I/O is involved in starting up the tests. I'm sure a similar scenario exists for gcj. Regards, Jeroen