Michael Koch wrote:
> On Monday 11 October 2004 15:39, Jeroen Frijters wrote:
> > I have some code that depends on unspecified behavior of
> > java.util.Date. In the Sun JDK if you pass out of range parameters
> > to the Date constructors that take year, month, date, etc. it will
> > automatically convert to a valid date (for example, new Date(104,
> > 8, 41) is Oct 11, 2004.)
> >
> > I have a rather lame patch that addresses this (see below), would
> > anyone object to this?
> 
> Are there mauve test that confirm that this breaks nothing ?

I made a new Mauve test (attached) that works better with my patch
(after I fixed one error in my patch and fixed an additional Date bug),
but it still fails on three tests. One is due to a bug in
GregorianCalendar and I haven't investigated the other two.

Is the attached test OK to commit? Do I need to modify any other Mauve
files to add the test?

Regards,
Jeroen