From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11726 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2005 21:13:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11710 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2005 21:13:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2005 21:13:25 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j22LDOW5031057 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:13:25 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn50-79.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.79]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j22LDNK31635; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:13:24 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id ABFCF816FCD; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:11:14 -0700 (MST) To: Dalibor Topic Cc: Taoufik EL AOUMARI , mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Jacks tests for the new java spec References: <20050302161230.42470.qmail@web51010.mail.yahoo.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:13:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20050302161230.42470.qmail@web51010.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2005-q1/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2 >> Are there gonna be tests for the jsr-201 (Enumerations, Autoboxing, >> Enhanced for loops and Static Import) in the next Jacks updates ? >> >> Is there a possiblity to add our tests made for the jsr-201 ? Yeah, definitely. Dalibor> I think it would be great to have tests for the new jsrs Dalibor> added to jacks, too. You can ask Tom Tromey for cvs access Dalibor> to mauve/jacks. Fill out the handy form: http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/pdw/ps_form.cgi There are a few jacks tests for new language features already. And I think I have some more lying around that I haven't checked in yet... nothing very comprehensive though. Tom