From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11094 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2005 16:59:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10778 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2005 16:59:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2005 16:59:29 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1JGxTcG029954 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 11:59:29 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn50-79.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.79]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j1JGxNK22157; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 11:59:24 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 8D68C2DD39B; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:57:10 -0700 (MST) To: Bryce McKinlay Cc: mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: JLS vs JDK tags References: <4216B630.2030109@redhat.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:59:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4216B630.2030109@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2005-q1/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 Bryce> Does it make any sense to keep JLS tags in mauve? Only a handful of Bryce> test cases use them. I'd like to simplify the tags a little and Bryce> convert JLS1.2 -> JDK1.2, etc. I never really understood the distinction. I say nuke 'em. Tom