From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4248 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2005 23:28:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4219 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2005 23:28:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 30 Apr 2005 23:28:23 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3UNSN5S016044 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 19:28:23 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn50-84.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.84]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j3UNSGO14763; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 19:28:16 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id D37662DD22E; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 17:26:03 -0600 (MDT) To: Steven Schwarz Cc: mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: can Mauve help me test a PersonalJava implementation? References: From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 23:28:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Steven" == Steven Schwarz writes: Steven> Of these, I only had success with JDK 1.4.2. All of the others failed Steven> to compile the SimpleTestHarness, as well as some of the classes Steven> involved in various individual tests. The intent was always that this would work properly -- that you could compile the 1.x subset of Mauve with a 1.x compiler and runtime, and then try it. However, this has obviously bit-rotted, probably because nobody really uses anything < 1.4 any more. Patches to fix this are welcome ... :-) But of course we can't promise it won't break again unless this is done with some regularity. Steven> * With respect to this vendor's claim, it appears to be made in Steven> marketing literature dated 2001. Is it possible to go back to the Steven> sources that would have been current in 2001 in the current CVS Steven> repository? Sure, see the '-D' option to cvs. Tom