From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mauve-discuss-return-900-listarch-mauve-discuss=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 29713 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2005 14:49:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mauve-discuss-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/mauve-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 29601 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Sep 2005 14:48:51 -0000
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:48:51 +0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8JEmnqJ012438
	for <mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:48:49 -0400
Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn50-106.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.106])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j8JEmmV18629;
	Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:48:49 -0400
Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id 35CCB2DD4B3; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:43:28 -0600 (MDT)
To: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew@gmail.com>
Cc: mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Keeping Jacks Up-to-date
References: <dgg0sn$js7$1@sea.gmane.org>
	<m3hdcjd9m7.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <dghi45$m58$1@sea.gmane.org>
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com
X-Attribution:  Tom
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:49:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <dghi45$m58$1@sea.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <m3zmq96ru7.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2005-q3/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2

>> How about making them conditional so that people can continue to test
>> 1.4 compilers?  I think this is probably worthwhile for the next year
>> or so.

Ranjit> Yes, that'll be better, though I'm not sure of the Tcl incantations
Ranjit> necessary to achieve that.

Actually I have a patch to add '!boxing' constraints where needed,
that I forgot to check in.  Whoops.

Ranjit> [I notice that there are separate constraints called "jsr201" and
Ranjit> "staticImport" - AFAIK, JSR201 included static import (along with
Ranjit> auto-boxing, enhanced for, etc.). And I also notice that mainline
Ranjit> GCJ's gcj_setup should switch off for these constraints.]

Yeah.  The 201 additions were not planned much.
Feel free to fix this stuff if you like.

Tom