From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17858 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2006 10:28:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 17843 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Feb 2006 10:28:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from outmail128155.authsmtp.co.uk (HELO outmail128155.authsmtp.co.uk) (62.13.128.155) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:28:36 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.13] (host217-37-65-246.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.37.65.246]) (authenticated bits=0) by squirrel.dmpriest.net.uk (8.13.3/8.13.3/Kp) with ESMTP id k1MASVAo010562; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:28:31 GMT (envelope-from david.gilbert@object-refinery.com) Message-ID: <43FC3D06.4060209@object-refinery.com> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:28:00 -0000 From: David Gilbert User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lillian Angel CC: mauve-patches Subject: Re: Patch: New Lightweight tests References: <1140565958.22215.52.camel@tow.toronto.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1140565958.22215.52.camel@tow.toronto.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server-Quench: f8a0ae7b-a38d-11da-84c5-001185d377ca X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633132333134.squirrel.dmpriest.net.uk:1.47/Kp X-Powered-By: AuthSMTP - http://www.authsmtp.com - Authenticated SMTP Mail Relay X-Report-SPAM: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-Virus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system! X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact mauve-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006/txt/msg00162.txt.bz2 Hi Lillian, Lillian Angel wrote: > >Index: gnu/testlet/java/awt/Container/LightweightContainer.java >=================================================================== > > > >+ harness.checkRectangleOuterColors(r, bounds2, Color.red, true); >+ harness.checkRectangleCornerColors(r, bounds2, Color.red, false); >+ >+ r.delay(3000); >+ } > > Do you know what the delay is for? Is there some other way to write the test so that the delay isn't required? It's just that it would be nice if the Mauve test run doesn't take longer than it has to - otherwise hackers will stop running it. Regards, Dave