From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10381 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2006 17:57:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 10372 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jun 2006 17:57:46 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 17:57:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5GHvg0V027849; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:57:42 -0400 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5GHvbSw022453; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:57:37 -0400 Received: from [172.16.14.37] (toadstool.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.37]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k5GHvave031941; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:57:37 -0400 Message-ID: <4492F110.4000805@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 17:57:00 -0000 From: Kyle Galloway User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Koch CC: mauve-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA JDWP TestOfCountFilter References: <44917466.5090406@redhat.com> <20060615153429.GO30916@mail.konqueror.de> <4491952A.1040508@redhat.com> <20060615173634.GQ30916@mail.konqueror.de> <4492D1C4.2070600@redhat.com> <20060616175251.GW30916@mail.konqueror.de> In-Reply-To: <20060616175251.GW30916@mail.konqueror.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact mauve-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006/txt/msg00426.txt.bz2 Michael Koch wrote: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:44:04AM -0400, Kyle Galloway wrote: > >> Looking at the GNU-Crypto tests, I think that the JDWP test should be >> tagged GNU-JDWP JDK 1.4. Any comments about this idea? >> > > As AFAIK a new tag begins after a whitespace this would be three tags > with two of them wrong. > Ok, so would just GNU-JDWP be the best option, I don't know much about how these tags work, but this seems like it would allow for these tests to be excluded from the normal Classpath vs Sun tests while still being able to call the whole set of them to test all the JDWP filters. > Just my 2 cents, > > > Cheers, > Michael >