From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <> Received: from dedi169.cpt3.host-h.net (dedi169.cpt3.host-h.net [197.221.10.17]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CF8E3951C03 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 06:52:24 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 4CF8E3951C03 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dedi169.cpt3.host-h.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.helo=dedi169.cpt3.host-h.net Received: from Debian-exim by dedi169.cpt3.host-h.net with local (Exim 4.92) id 1mraWU-000Axv-60 for mauve-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 08:52:22 +0200 X-Failed-Recipients: info@fbvending.co.za Auto-Submitted: auto-replied From: Mail Delivery System To: mauve-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary=1638168742-eximdsn-1723469414 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Message-Id: Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 08:52:22 +0200 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HTML_MESSAGE, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: mauve-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Mauve-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 06:52:26 -0000 --1638168742-eximdsn-1723469414 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: info@fbvending.co.za Unrouteable address --1638168742-eximdsn-1723469414 Content-type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns; dedi169.cpt3.host-h.net Action: failed Final-Recipient: rfc822;info@fbvending.co.za Status: 5.0.0 --1638168742-eximdsn-1723469414 Content-type: message/rfc822 Return-path: Received: from omr15.orchid.atmailcloud.com ([13.251.197.89]) by dedi169.cpt3.host-h.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mraWQ-000AxC-0H for info@fbvending.co.za; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 08:52:22 +0200 Received: from MRR.i-08f8bfa33197c8af3 by OMR.i-071a692e52084b6df with esmtps (envelope-from ) id 1mraVQ-00046K-Un; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:51:16 +0800 Received: from CMR.i-0d1869091de330f84 by MRR.i-08f8bfa33197c8af3 with esmtps (envelope-from ) id 1mraVQ-0000Lz-JC; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:51:16 +0800 Received: from [203.125.107.34] (helo=DCRBCJ23.shengsheng.local) by CMR.i-0d1869091de330f84 with esmtp (envelope-from ) id 1mraVM-0005J7-8u; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:51:15 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: WARM REGARDS To: Recipients From: "BEN JOHNSON" Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:46:06 +0800 Reply-To: bjattorneys5@gmail.com X-Atmail-Id: mauve-patches@sourceware.org X-atmailcloud-spam-score: 1000 X-atmailcloud-spam-bar: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ X-atmailcloud-spam-action: reject X-Virus-Scanned: Clear X-Unfudged-Spam-Flag: YES X-Unfudged-Spam-Report: spam_server=spamd3.cpt1.host-h.net Spam detection software, running on the system "spamd3.cpt1.host-h.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, please contact your email administrator. Content analysis details: (13.2 points, 5 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------------- 0.0 JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL ASKDNS: SPF set to ?all [sourceware.org TXT:v=spf1 a mx] [?all] 2.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100% [score: 1.0000] 0.2 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100% [score: 1.0000] 0.2 RELAYCOUNTRY_BAD_US Relayed through the US 1.0 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_NOT_REPLYTO_SAME_DOMAIN From domain does not match Reply-To domain 0.0 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) 0.0 FROM_IS_TO From and To is the same 0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends in digit (bjattorneys5[at]gmail.com) 0.5 FROM_NOT_REPLYTO From does not match Reply-To 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.3 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL RBL: Relay in Validity RPBL, https://senderscore.org/blocklistlookup/ [13.251.197.89 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 4.0 PYZOR_CHECK Listed in Pyzor (https://pyzor.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) 0.5 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header 0.2 KAM_DMARC_NONE DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the message and the domain has no DMARC policy 0.2 H_FSL_BULK_SIG Bulk signature with no Unsubscribe 0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment 2.1 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: Mail message body Good Day, An exhaustive and meticulous search was conducted and it is in connection = with this search that I'm writing to you today base on your surname which y= ou share with a client that is now deceased. Revert back to me for more det= ails to be given to you. = Sincerely, Barr Ben Johnson --1638168742-eximdsn-1723469414--