From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <> Received: from dedi402.nur4.host-h.net (dedi402.nur4.host-h.net [88.198.184.229]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D733395B0BE for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 07:16:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6D733395B0BE Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dedi402.nur4.host-h.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.helo=dedi402.nur4.host-h.net Received: from Debian-exim by dedi402.nur4.host-h.net with local (Exim 4.92) id 1mratZ-0007nh-Gb for mauve-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 09:16:13 +0200 X-Failed-Recipients: kirsten.smith@sacssa.net Auto-Submitted: auto-replied From: Mail Delivery System To: mauve-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary=1638170173-eximdsn-1754516648 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Message-Id: Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 09:16:13 +0200 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HTML_MESSAGE, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: mauve-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Mauve-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 07:16:15 -0000 --1638170173-eximdsn-1754516648 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: kirsten.smith@sacssa.net Unrouteable address --1638170173-eximdsn-1754516648 Content-type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns; dedi402.nur4.host-h.net Action: failed Final-Recipient: rfc822;kirsten.smith@sacssa.net Status: 5.0.0 --1638170173-eximdsn-1754516648 Content-type: message/rfc822 Return-path: Received: from omr15.orchid.atmailcloud.com ([13.251.197.89]) by dedi402.nur4.host-h.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mratW-0007n5-TC for kirsten.smith@sacssa.net; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 09:16:13 +0200 Received: from MRR.i-0faca4c6781e4107f by OMR.i-071a692e52084b6df with esmtps (envelope-from ) id 1mrasw-0002Ac-2J; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 15:15:34 +0800 Received: from CMR.i-0378b006b4445375e by MRR.i-0faca4c6781e4107f with esmtps (envelope-from ) id 1mrasd-0000wV-J4; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 15:15:15 +0800 Received: from [203.125.107.34] (helo=DCRBCJ23.shengsheng.local) by CMR.i-0378b006b4445375e with esmtp (envelope-from ) id 1mrasW-0005bQ-Kb; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 15:15:13 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: WARM REGARDS To: Recipients From: "BEN JOHNSON" Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 15:11:49 +0800 Reply-To: bjattorneys5@gmail.com X-Atmail-Id: mauve-patches@sourceware.org X-atmailcloud-spam-score: 1000 X-atmailcloud-spam-bar: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ X-atmailcloud-spam-action: reject X-Virus-Scanned: Clear X-Unfudged-Spam-Flag: YES X-Unfudged-Spam-Report: spam_server=spamd1.flk1.host-h.net Spam detection software, running on the system "spamd1.flk1.host-h.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, please contact your email administrator. Content analysis details: (13.2 points, 5 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------------- 0.0 JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL ASKDNS: SPF set to ?all [sourceware.org TXT:v=spf1 a mx] [?all] 0.2 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100% [score: 1.0000] 2.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100% [score: 1.0000] 0.2 RELAYCOUNTRY_BAD_US Relayed through the US 1.0 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals 0.0 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends in digit (bjattorneys5[at]gmail.com) 0.5 FROM_NOT_REPLYTO_SAME_DOMAIN From domain does not match Reply-To domain 0.0 FROM_IS_TO From and To is the same 0.5 FROM_NOT_REPLYTO From does not match Reply-To 1.3 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL RBL: Relay in Validity RPBL, https://senderscore.org/blocklistlookup/ [13.251.197.89 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 4.0 PYZOR_CHECK Listed in Pyzor (https://pyzor.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) 0.2 H_FSL_BULK_SIG Bulk signature with no Unsubscribe 0.5 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header 0.2 KAM_DMARC_NONE DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the message and the domain has no DMARC policy 0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment 2.1 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: Mail message body Good Day, An exhaustive and meticulous search was conducted and it is in connection = with this search that I'm writing to you today base on your surname which y= ou share with a client that is now deceased. Revert back to me for more det= ails to be given to you. = Sincerely, Barr Ben Johnson --1638170173-eximdsn-1754516648--