public inbox for newlib-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [newlib-cygwin] libm: Fixing overflow handling issue for scalbnf and scalbn
@ 2021-07-21 7:59 Corinna Vinschen
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Corinna Vinschen @ 2021-07-21 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: newlib-cvs
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=newlib-cygwin.git;h=ca7b4bd23676a9cb6d82974c2ed452e08abb7ecf
commit ca7b4bd23676a9cb6d82974c2ed452e08abb7ecf
Author: Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com>
Date: Mon Jul 19 16:50:22 2021 +0800
libm: Fixing overflow handling issue for scalbnf and scalbn
cc Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com> and Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com>,
they are author of new VRP analysis for GCC, just to make sure I didn't
mis-understanding or mis-interpreting anything on GCC site.
GCC 11 have better value range analysis, that give GCC more confidence
to perform more aggressive optimization, but it cause scalbn/scalbnf get
wrong result.
Using scalbn to demostrate what happened on GCC 11, see comments with VRP
prefix:
```c
double scalbn (double x, int n)
{
/* VRP RESULT: n = [-INF, +INF] */
__int32_t k,hx,lx;
...
k = (hx&0x7ff00000)>>20;
/* VRP RESULT: k = [0, 2047] */
if (k==0) {
/* VRP RESULT: k = 0 */
...
k = ((hx&0x7ff00000)>>20) - 54;
if (n< -50000) return tiny*x; /*underflow*/
/* VRP RESULT: k = -54 */
}
/* VRP RESULT: k = [-54, 2047] */
if (k==0x7ff) return x+x; /* NaN or Inf */
/* VRP RESULT: k = [-54, 2046] */
k = k+n;
if (k > 0x7fe) return huge*copysign(huge,x); /* overflow */
/* VRP RESULT: k = [-INF, 2046] */
/* VRP RESULT: n = [-INF, 2100],
because k + n <= 0x7fe is false, so:
1. -INF < [-54, 2046] + n <= 0x7fe(2046) < INF
2. -INF < [-54, 2046] + n <= 2046 < INF
3. -INF < n <= 2046 - [-54, 2046] < INF
4. -INF < n <= [0, 2100] < INF
5. n = [-INF, 2100] */
if (k > 0) /* normal result */
{SET_HIGH_WORD(x,(hx&0x800fffff)|(k<<20)); return x;}
if (k <= -54) {
/* VRP OPT: Evaluate n > 50000 as true...*/
if (n > 50000) /* in case integer overflow in n+k */
return huge*copysign(huge,x); /*overflow*/
else return tiny*copysign(tiny,x); /*underflow*/
}
k += 54; /* subnormal result */
SET_HIGH_WORD(x,(hx&0x800fffff)|(k<<20));
return x*twom54;
}
```
However give the input n = INT32_MAX, k = k+n will overflow, and then we
expect got `huge*copysign(huge,x)`, but new VRP optimization think
`n > 50000` is never be true, so optimize that into `tiny*copysign(tiny,x)`.
so the solution here is to moving the overflow handle logic before `k = k + n`.
Diff:
---
newlib/libm/common/s_scalbn.c | 9 ++++-----
newlib/libm/common/sf_scalbn.c | 9 ++++-----
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/newlib/libm/common/s_scalbn.c b/newlib/libm/common/s_scalbn.c
index e9dbb16ac..72da0e4a1 100644
--- a/newlib/libm/common/s_scalbn.c
+++ b/newlib/libm/common/s_scalbn.c
@@ -93,15 +93,14 @@ tiny = 1.0e-300;
if (n< -50000) return tiny*x; /*underflow*/
}
if (k==0x7ff) return x+x; /* NaN or Inf */
+ if (n > 50000) /* in case integer overflow in n+k */
+ return huge*copysign(huge,x); /*overflow*/
k = k+n;
if (k > 0x7fe) return huge*copysign(huge,x); /* overflow */
if (k > 0) /* normal result */
{SET_HIGH_WORD(x,(hx&0x800fffff)|(k<<20)); return x;}
- if (k <= -54) {
- if (n > 50000) /* in case integer overflow in n+k */
- return huge*copysign(huge,x); /*overflow*/
- else return tiny*copysign(tiny,x); /*underflow*/
- }
+ if (k <= -54)
+ return tiny*copysign(tiny,x); /*underflow*/
k += 54; /* subnormal result */
SET_HIGH_WORD(x,(hx&0x800fffff)|(k<<20));
return x*twom54;
diff --git a/newlib/libm/common/sf_scalbn.c b/newlib/libm/common/sf_scalbn.c
index 700060010..747a421ef 100644
--- a/newlib/libm/common/sf_scalbn.c
+++ b/newlib/libm/common/sf_scalbn.c
@@ -56,15 +56,14 @@ tiny = 1.0e-30;
k = ((ix&0x7f800000)>>23) - 25;
if (n< -50000) return tiny*x; /*underflow*/
}
+ if (n > OVERFLOW_INT) /* in case integer overflow in n+k */
+ return huge*copysignf(huge,x); /*overflow*/
k = k+n;
if (k > FLT_LARGEST_EXP) return huge*copysignf(huge,x); /* overflow */
if (k > 0) /* normal result */
{SET_FLOAT_WORD(x,(ix&0x807fffff)|(k<<23)); return x;}
- if (k < FLT_SMALLEST_EXP) {
- if (n > OVERFLOW_INT) /* in case integer overflow in n+k */
- return huge*copysignf(huge,x); /*overflow*/
- else return tiny*copysignf(tiny,x); /*underflow*/
- }
+ if (k < FLT_SMALLEST_EXP)
+ return tiny*copysignf(tiny,x); /*underflow*/
k += 25; /* subnormal result */
SET_FLOAT_WORD(x,(ix&0x807fffff)|(k<<23));
return x*twom25;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-07-21 7:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-07-21 7:59 [newlib-cygwin] libm: Fixing overflow handling issue for scalbnf and scalbn Corinna Vinschen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).