From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dedi548.your-server.de (dedi548.your-server.de [85.10.215.148]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 651503851C33 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:04:29 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 651503851C33 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=embedded-brains.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de Received: from sslproxy02.your-server.de ([78.47.166.47]) by dedi548.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jyZxb-0005J6-Ks; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 14:04:27 +0200 Received: from [82.100.198.138] (helo=mail.embedded-brains.de) by sslproxy02.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jyZxb-000UJa-Gp; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 14:04:27 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.embedded-brains.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6172A1610; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 14:04:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.embedded-brains.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.eb.localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 6yuO8GlRqwm8; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 14:04:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.embedded-brains.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B8E2A165B; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 14:04:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.eb.localhost Received: from mail.embedded-brains.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.eb.localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ItnxxVHE0hwI; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 14:04:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from shuber-nb-linux.eb.localhost (unknown [10.10.171.22]) by mail.embedded-brains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6CC02A1610; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 14:04:29 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove multiple defination error To: Eric Bresie , Eshan dhawan via Newlib References: <1205787e-7423-4387-875e-bc4ad312e25f@Erics-iPhone-X> From: Sebastian Huber Message-ID: <05423ec6-846c-ea45-0a41-a0fa6e6beb24@embedded-brains.de> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 14:04:25 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1205787e-7423-4387-875e-bc4ad312e25f@Erics-iPhone-X> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Authenticated-Sender: smtp-embedded@poldinet.de X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.102.3/25881/Wed Jul 22 16:35:43 2020) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: newlib@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Newlib mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:04:30 -0000 On 23/07/2020 13:54, Eric Bresie via Newlib wrote: > Just wanted to confirm in the below cases... > > Is it suppose to do both vfp and softfp operations when #ifndef SOFTFP_ABI or should it be one or the other? This patch was replaced by: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/2020/017780.html Only one implementation will be provided as selected by the C preprocessor.