From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14775 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2003 14:59:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact newlib-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: newlib-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14766 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2003 14:59:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sark.cc.gatech.edu) (130.207.7.23) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Jan 2003 14:59:16 -0000 Received: from moorea.cc.gatech.edu (moorea.cc.gatech.edu [130.207.5.176]) by sark.cc.gatech.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0EExFa19846 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:59:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from moorea (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by moorea.cc.gatech.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h0EExEV28526 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:59:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:59:00 -0000 From: Josh Fryman To: newlib@sources.redhat.com Subject: newlib on sparc64? Message-Id: <20030114095913.4f796146.fryman@cc.gatech.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2 hi, this may be a dumb question, but i thought i'd ask anyway. we're wanting to build newlib to be a sparc64 replacement for glibc, and to be used with gcc for sparc64. we want smaller, more targeted applications for some studies we're working on. this could be either solaris or linux native, we're indifferent to which way it goes. does this work (for either variant, sol v linux)? anyone have any caveats or such? thanks, josh