public inbox for newlib@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
To: newlib@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] newlib/.../getreent.c: Allow to be provided by host and do so for RTEMS
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171013091515.GD20139@calimero.vinschen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81d2f590-0370-9318-4d6d-c60254a1c068@oarcorp.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3087 bytes --]

On Oct 12 20:31, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On 10/11/2017 8:54 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > 
> > Sorry to top post but replying from my phone on a plane.
> > 
> > Some of our tests are managing to get duplicate symbol errors when linking.
> > 
> > I put the dummy symbol in to follow the pattern in the file I patterned this after. I would have to look at the source again to see what file that was
> > 
> > 
> > On Oct 11, 2017, 9:49 AM, at 9:49 AM, Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hi Joel,
> > 
> > On Oct 11 07:57, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >   RTEMS provides the option to have a global or per-thread reentrancy
> >   as part of application configuration. As part of this, RTEMS provides
> >   the implementation of __getreent() as appropriate. Allow the target
> >   to determine if this method is present in libc.a.
> >   ---
> >    newlib/configure.host<http://configure.host>        | 2 +-
> >    newlib/libc/reent/getreent.c | 8 ++++++++
> >    2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> >   diff --git a/newlib/configure.host<http://configure.host> b/newlib/configure.host<http://configure.host>
> >   index fb3362b..7f397dd 100644
> >   --- a/newlib/configure.host<http://configure.host>
> >   +++ b/newlib/configure.host<http://configure.host>
> >   @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ case "${host}" in
> >          default_newlib_io_long_long="yes"
> >          default_newlib_io_c99_formats="yes"
> >          newlib_cflags="${newlib_cflags} -D_COMPILING_NEWLIB"
> >   -      newlib_cflags="${newlib_cflags} -DCLOCK_PROVIDED -DMALLOC_PROVIDED
> > -DEXIT_PROVIDED -DSIGNAL_PROVIDED -DREENTRANT_SYSCALLS_PROVIDED
> > -DHAVE_NANOSLEEP -DHAVE_BLKSIZE -DHAVE_FCNTL -DHAVE_ASSERT_FUNC"
> >   +newlib_cflags="${newlib_cflags} -DCLOCK_PROVIDED -DMALLOC_PROVIDED
> > -DEXIT_PROVIDED -DSIGNAL_PROVIDED -DGETREENT_PROVIDED
> > -DREENTRANT_SYSCALLS_PROVIDED -DHAVE_NANOSLEEP -DHAVE_BLKSIZE
> > -DHAVE_FCNTL -DHAVE_ASSERT_FUNC"
> >            # turn off unsupported items in posix directory
> >          newlib_cflags="${newlib_cflags} -D_NO_GETLOGIN -D_NO_GETPWENT
> > -D_NO_GETUT -D_NO_GETPASS -D_NO_SIGSET -D_NO_WORDEXP -D_NO_POPEN
> > -D_NO_POSIX_SPAWN"
> >          ;;
> >   diff --git a/newlib/libc/reent/getreent.c
> > b/newlib/libc/reent/getreent.c
> >   index 60ae6fb..124abce 100644
> >   --- a/newlib/libc/reent/getreent.c
> >   +++ b/newlib/libc/reent/getreent.c
> >   @@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
> >    /* default reentrant pointer when multithread enabled */
> > 
> >   +#ifdef GETREENT_PROVIDED
> >   +
> >   +int _dummy_getreent;
> >   +
> > 
> > So, why do you need this?  If you implement your own __getreent,
> > there's
> > no reason for this _dummy_getreent to exist, no?
> > 
> > Btw., Cygwin implements its own __getreent(), too, without having to
> > change newlib/libc/reent/getreent.c at all...
> 
> Is it OK to push these patches?

I still need an explanation for _dummy_getreent.  It's kind of ugly.
Why exaclty is it required?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-13  9:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-11 12:58 [PATCH v2 0/2] RTEMS configure.host patches Joel Sherrill
2017-10-11 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] newlib/.../getreent.c: Allow to be provided by host and do so for RTEMS Joel Sherrill
2017-10-11 13:54   ` Corinna Vinschen
2017-10-11 16:28     ` Joel Sherrill
2017-10-13  6:09       ` Joel Sherrill
2017-10-13  9:16         ` Corinna Vinschen [this message]
2017-11-13  9:59           ` Joel Sherrill
2017-11-13 15:46             ` Corinna Vinschen
2017-11-14  8:01               ` Florian Schmidt
2017-10-17 11:40   ` Sebastian Huber
2017-10-11 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] newlib/configure.host: Remove obsolete definition of _I386MACH_ALLOW_HW_INTERRUPTS Joel Sherrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171013091515.GD20139@calimero.vinschen.de \
    --to=vinschen@redhat.com \
    --cc=newlib@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).