On Jan 29 08:49, Keith Packard wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > This hunk looks wrong.  We can fix this manually easily, but it
> > would be great if this get catched by the script, right?
> 
> Oh, I don't think we would want to ship the script; once we've run it,
> it shouldn't be necessary going forward. So, if we can review the
> results and fix up any minor mistakes by hand, that seems like a good
> result.
> 
> In this case, we probably cannot remove the advertising clause because I
> don't have a statement from them changing their license.

Ok, I pushed the changes with the questionable hunk removed.


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat